Christians
sing. Its what we do. It is arguably a state of being just as it is an action.
Jews and Muslims have liturgical poems and melodic prayers. Buddhists and
Taoists chant or use ritual music. But I’ve never heard any other theology or
belief system sung. I’ve certainly never heard an atheist sing his or her
beliefs with joy and tears, rather than parody. I’ve never read a hymn about
self-actualization, freethinking, relativism, post-modernity, the problem of
evil, or the uncertainty principle that warms my soul. It’s difficult for me to
imagine hymns called “Amazing Skepticism,”
or “I Asked the Hawking,” or “Let us Prove and Doubt and Question,” or
“I Sing Because I’m Skeptical, I Sing
Because I’m Free.”
“Theologies that
cannot be sung (or prayed for that matter) are certainly wrong at a deep level,
and such theologies leave me, in both senses, cold: cold-hearted and
uninterested.” – J.I. Packer, God
Has Spoken
“A theology that
cannot be sung is not worth having.... Authentic Christian faith is not merely
believed. Nor is it merely acted upon. It is sung – with utter joy sometimes,
in uncontrollable tears sometimes, but it is sung.” – Reggie M. Kidd, With One Voice: Discovering Christ's Song in
Our Worship
There are a
couple hymns that I consider in the canon of RUF. If I made you a random mixed CD
or a playlist, two things will be on it every time: Anberlin’s “Fin” and Indelible Grace’s “I Asked the Lord,” along with some Page
CXVI and MuteMath and Nickelback and all that. Here are the lyrics:
“(Vs.
1) I asked the Lord that I might grow,
in faith and love and every grace, might
more of His salvation know,
and seek more earnestly His face.
(Vs. 2) Twas He
who taught me thus to pray,
and He I trust has answered prayer,
but it has been
in such a way,
as almost drove me to despair. (Vs.
3) I hoped that in some
favored hour, at once He'd answer my request,
and by His love's constraining
power,
subdue my sins and give me rest. (Vs.
4) Instead of this He made me feel,
the
hidden evils of my heart,
and let the angry powers of Hell,
assault my soul in
every part. (Vs.
5) Yea more with His own hand He seemed,
intent to aggravate
my woe,
crossed all the fair designs I schemed,
cast out my feelings, laid me
low. (Vs.
6) Lord why is this, I trembling cried,
wilt Thou pursue thy worm to
death?
"Tis in this way," The Lord replied,
"I answer prayer for
grace and faith."
(Vs. 7) "These inward trials I employ,
from self
and pride to set thee free, and break thy schemes of earthly joy,
that thou
mayest seek thy all in Me,
that thou mayest seek thy all in Me." – John Newton,
alt. Laura Taylor
Some of us
love this hymn. Some of us hate this hymn. I think this is one of the more
difficult hymns that we sing as Christians either because we don’t know what it
means or because it addresses us as “worm” in the second to last verse.
And yet, many
of us move from hating it to crying with it to loving it and maybe eventually
even laughing with it. How is this possible?
This hymn
captures the very essence of what sanctification means – that fancy theological
term that means that Jesus is making us more like Him. And that is beautiful,
but it is also very hard, and sometimes it feels like death. If you’re like me
you get frustrated because you think that God will answer your prayers in the
manner and in the time within which you would like them to be answered, even
seemingly “holy” prayers regarding repentance and sin:
(Vs. 1) “I asked
the Lord that I might grow,
in faith and love and every grace, might more of
His salvation know, and seek more earnestly His face.” (Skip to vs. 3) “I hoped
that in some favored hour,
at once He'd answer my request.”
So why does
it seem like we pray this Vs. 1 prayer only to be met with Vs. 5: “Yea more with His
own hand He seemed,
intent to aggravate my woe”?
You see His
goal all along is to make us fall more in love with Him. He yearns to destroy
our pride and “hidden evils” and “fair designs” – our “schemes.” And that, so
very often, requires circumstances that hurt, precisely because they destroy
the very thing we’ve been clinging to for so long when we hurt. It feels like
death to die to the idols that kill us.
That’s why
it’s so hard for Bilbo to let the ring go at the beginning of The Fellowship of
the Ring; it hurts him. That’s why Eustace describes Aslan ripping off his
dragonous flesh as “hurting more than anything.” Our idols being ripped from
our hands often means that our fingers break.
Maybe you’ve
seen this happen between a father and his young son. I hope you have. We’re
like children who picked up something and our dad is saying, “Put it down.” We
defiantly respond “No.” Again, our Father firmly states, “Son, put it down.” We
stand resolute – “No.” But then the Father grabs our hand, and gently repeats,
“Son, put it down.” The Father’s touch is what allows us to let go.
Brian has
said quite beautifully and eloquently in his previous blogs that Jesus sits in
the ashes with us, weeps with us, and then laughs and picks us up to run with
Him. We worship a sympathizing Jesus who sings over us – even in the midst of
our sin He sings over you and me. Over a delicious beer at Flying Saucer, Devin Colleton, Midtown music leader and co-music
leader for RUF, said it this way: “I know now more what I couldn’t have known
before” (I certainly hope he meant it to rhyme). Dr. Sinclair Ferguson, head
minister of First Presbyterian Church has said “there’s a grace that I never
could have tasted if not for the bitterness given to me. Dulcius ex asperis is what we sing, Latin for “sweeter after
difficulty.” This is the thorn that Paul talks about – embracing a reputation
of weakness.
Perhaps the band
My Epic puts it best:
“I can't sing that
song the same way anymore, cause I start laughing at the parts, where I could
only weep before. And it sounds sweeter now, because the notes can't ring, until
they echo through each wasted year, that You restored to me. I've been,
thinking, of how You wept for Lazarus, tears on, Your cheeks, resurrection on
Your lips. Sometimes, mercy, can feel like abandonment, but You know all about
it.” – My Epic, “Lazarus”
When we begin
to understand this concept, that Jesus leads us into darkness, stays with us in
the darkness, only to have us emerge on the other side seeking everything in
Him, we move from hating “I Asked the Lord” to weeping with it, and then
eventually to laughing at the parts where we could only weep before. This
meaning is given to the music not by chance, or skill, or association, or
tradition, but exists inherently through it.
It’s not so
much that music tells a story, so
much as it tells the story. Samwise
and Tolkien were right when they said that staying in Lothlorien was like “living
in a song.” Indeed, the Christian life is exactly the same.
As Christians
we love, and sing, and wonder. That is the only response to Jesus’ grace. When
we encounter true beauty, when we encounter something as rich and mysterious as
music, when we encounter a Savior, our only response is to step into it. Our
only response is one of humility, unity, and thankfulness. Our only response is
to feel our hearts leap and quiver. It’s more than just a simple argument or
apologetic; it’s bigger than a proof or an eloquent syllogism. It is quite
beautifully simple – We sing because we’re happy. We sing because we’re free.
“Let
the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in
all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in
your hearts to God.” – Colossians 3:16
“To Christ the Lord
let every tongue, its noblest tribute bring. When He’s the subject of the song,
who can refuse to sing? … A thousand men could not compose, a worthy song to
bring. Yet Your love is a melody. Our hearts can’t help but sing!” –
Laura Taylor, “To Christ The Lord”
Forgive me for
abridging John 21:25 a bit – “Now there are also many other songs that Jesus sang. Were
every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not
contain the music that would be sung.”
…FOR HIS EYE IS
ON THE SPARROW, AND I KNOW HE WATCHES ME.
References: A special thanks to Brian
Mesimer (the man, the myth, the legend) for graciously allowing me to use his
blog as a publishing medium. To crudely summarize my sources – Alvin Plantinga,
“Two Dozen (or so) Theistic Arguments”; Karl Rahner, “Meditations on the Word
“God””; Dr. Derek Thomas, “Centerpoint School Introduction to Systematic
Theology” – First Presbyterian Church; Timothy Keller, The Reason for God,
Counterfeit Gods, “Evangelistic Worship,” “Worship Worthy of the Name,”
and http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/08/05/in-defense-of-apologetics/;
J.I. Packer, God Has Spoken; Reggie M. Kidd, With One Voice: Discovering Christ's Song in Our Worship; Suites Culturelles, http://suitesculturelles.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/this-is-your-brain-on-music/;
C. S. Lewis, Miracles, The Weight of Glory – “Transposition,” Mere Christianity,
That Hideous Strength, The Magician’s Nephew; James S. Cutsinger,
“The Question of God” – reductio ad
absurdum, The Cardinal Difficulty of Naturalism; Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, “The Holy Longing”; Stephen Hawking,
“The Origin of the Universe” lecture; Sanjib Mishra, conversation regarding the
uncertainty principle; Sinclair B. Ferguson, “The Suffering of Jesus”; Brian A.
Mesimer, “Video Game Jesus”; Page CXVI – http://pagecxvi.com; J.R.R. Tolkien,
“The Silmarillion”; et. al: John
Piper, Jon Foreman, Bob Kauflin, Kevin Twitt, Britton Wood, Sammy Rhodes, David
Kay, Brandon O’Brien, Daniel Levitin, Soren Kornegay, Christian Crouch, Mark
Dever, Indelible Grace, David Crowder, as well as fellow musicians and artists
who have either served in a music leadership role (Brian Mesimer, Ryan Patane,
Kelly McLachlan, John Wessel, Stephen Wessel, Tom Walsh) or are passionate
about art in music (Ryan Bowen, Adam Fischer, Daniel Howell). A special thanks
to Daniel Meier and Chris Faulkner for their thoughtful edits and criticisms.


No comments:
Post a Comment